Loss of opportunities in the diagnosis and treatment of primary obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (POAPS): from theory to reality.

OBJECTIVES: (I) To identify and measure the clinical consequences of a delayed diagnosis in patients with primary obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (POAPS), in terms of time and events associated to antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), and (II) to evaluate the impact of their treatment status on perinatal outcomes, before and after diagnosis. METHODS: This retrospective multicentre study included 99 POAPS women who were separated in two groups of timelines based on their diagnostic status: group 1: women who met the clinical criteria for POAPS; group 2: included the same patients from group 1 since they meet the laboratory criteria for APS. In group 1, we assessed the following variables: obstetric events, thrombotic events and time (years) to diagnosis of APS. We also compared perinatal outcomes between patients in group 1 vs. group 2. Women in group 2 were treated with standard of care for POAPS. Simple and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Regarding the impact of the delay on diagnosis, a total of 87 APS-related events were recorded: 46 miscarriages, 32 foetal losses and 9 premature deliveries before the 34th week due to preeclampsia, and one thrombosis. The estimated rate of preventable events was 20.58 per year/100 patients. The mean diagnostic delay time was 4.27 years. When we compared both groups during pregnancy, we found that patients in group 1 (no treatment) had a higher association with pregnancy losses [OR = 6.71 (95% CI: 3.59-12.55), p < 0.0001]. CONCLUSION: Our findings emphasize the negative impact of POAPS underdiagnosis on patient health and the critical importance of a timely intervention to improve pregnancy outcomes. Key Points •Our study shows the relevance of underdiagnosis on primary obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (POAPS). •These patients presented a high risk of APS-related events with each passing year. •Shorter diagnostic delay time was observed in the reference centres.

Clinical and therapeutic value of the adjusted Global Antiphospholipid Syndrome Score in primary obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To assess the clinical utility of the adjusted global antiphospholipid syndrome score (aGAPSS) to predict new obstetric events during follow-up in primary obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (POAPS) patients under standard-of-care treatment (SC) based on the use of low-dose aspirin (LDA) + heparin and (2) to study the risk of a first thrombotic event and to evaluate whether stratification according to this score could help to identify POAPS patients who would benefit from long-term thromboprophylaxis. METHODS: This is a retrospective, multicentre study. 169 women with POAPS were evaluated for the presence of a new obstetric event and/or a first thrombotic event during follow-up [time period: 2008-2020, median: 7 years (6-12 years)]. The outcomes of 107 pregnancies from these POAPS patients with SC were studied to evaluate relapses. Simple and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Regarding obstetric morbidity, only triple positivity for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) [OR = 8.462 (95% CI: 2.732-26.210); p < 0.0001] was found to be a strong risk factor independently associated with treatment failure. On the other hand, triple positivity for aPLs [OR=10.44 (95% CI: 2.161-50.469), p = 0.004] and an aGAPSS ≥7 [OR = 1.621 (95% CI: 1.198-2.193), p = 0.002] were independent risk factors associated with a first thrombotic event. LDA was marginally associated with a decrease in the risk of thrombosis only in patients with aGAPSS ≥ 7 (p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: aGAPSS appears to be useful in predicting the occurrence of a first thrombotic event in POAPS patients, and these stratification of patients could be helpful in selecting patients who would benefit from thromboprophylaxis with LDA.

Risk factors for early severe preeclampsia in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome with conventional treatment. The impact of hydroxychloroquine.

OBJECTIVE: The first aim was to retrospectively identify risk factors for the development of early severe preeclampsia (sPE) in patients with obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS) who received conventional treatment (CT). The second aim was to evaluate the impact of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in preventing early sPE among a subgroup of patients considered at high risk. METHODS: A total of 102 women diagnosed with OAPS and treated with CT since the diagnosis of pregnancy were selected. At the end of pregnancy, we identified risk factors associated with early sPE. According to these risk factors, we collected a new cohort of 42 patients who presented high-risk factors for developing early sPE and split them into two groups according to the treatment received: group A, CT (30 patients); and group B, CT+HCQ (12 patients). We evaluated and compared pregnancy outcomes in both groups. RESULTS: According to the multivariate analysis, risk factors associated with early sPE and CT were triple positivity for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) (OR = 24.70, [4.27-142.92], p < 0.001) and a history of early sPE (OR = 7.11, [1.13-44.64], p = 0.036). A low-risk aPL profile was associated with a good response to CT in preventing early sPE (OR = 0.073, [0.014-0.382], p = 0.002). High-risk patients treated with CT+HCQ had a significantly lower early sPE rate than those treated with CT only (8.3% vs 40.0%; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Triple positivity for aPL and a history of early sPE are potential strong risk factors for the development of early sPE. HCQ might be an interesting therapeutic option for patients with high-risk factors for early sPE.

What is the best time to assess the antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) profile to better predict the obstetric outcome in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) patients?

Serological risk factors are the most important determinant in predicting unsuccessful pregnancy in obstetric antiphospholipid antibodies syndrome (OAPS) despite conventional treatment. It is not clear if changes in the profile of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) during pregnancy modify the risk associated with a poor response to conventional treatment. The aim of our study was to compare the value of a serological tag for aPL obtained before and during the first trimester of pregnancy to predict the response to conventional treatment. We carefully selected 97 pregnancies in women who were included in our study only if they were diagnosed with OAPS prior to a new pregnancy (basal serological risk), retested for aPL during the first trimester of pregnancy (serological risk during pregnancy), and treated with conventional therapy. High baseline serological risk was associated with pregnancy failure in 62.1% of cases (18/29) and predicted 82.5% of pregnancy outcomes with conventional treatment: OR = 16.9, CI = 5.5-52.1, p < 0.001. High serological risk during pregnancy was associated with pregnancy failure in 86.3% of cases (19/22) and predicted 91.8% of pregnancy outcomes with conventional treatment: OR = 88.7, CI = 19.4-404.8, p < 0.001. According to these results, we found that risk categorization performed during pregnancy was better in predicting pregnancy outcome (82.5 vs. 91.8%). Moreover, risk categorization during pregnancy had an increased specificity regarding the prediction: 84.9% at baseline and 95.9% during pregnancy (p = 0.024). Our findings suggest that it is important to perform aPL during the first trimester of pregnancy since that is the best time to establish the serological risk factors.

The -2518 A/G polymorphism in the monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 gene is associated with the risk of developing systemic lupus erythematosus in Argentinean patients: a multicenter study.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic, autoimmune disorder. Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), a chemokine involved in the recruitment and migration of monocytes/macrophages, has been shown to be increased in the plasma of SLE patients. The aim of our study was to evaluate the possible association of the polymorphism -2518 of the MCP-1 gene with the risk of developing SLE, manifesting lupus nephritis (LN) and with other clinical features of SLE in an Argentinean population. A group of 171 SLE patients and 120 control subjects were examined. Genotypic and allelic frequencies of the MCP-1 -2518 A/G polymorphism showed significant differences between the SLE and the control groups (p=0.001 and p=0.01, respectively). However, the polymorphism showed no association with LN or with the other clinical variables studied. Our results suggest that the presence of the MCP-1 -2518 A/G polymorphism might be a risk factor for developing SLE in genetically predisposed individuals, but it does not seem to have a role in the evolution of the disease in the Argentinean population.

Plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 levels and nonalcoholic fatty liver in individuals with features of metabolic syndrome.

Fatty liver represents the liver component of metabolic syndrome and may be involved in plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) synthesis. We studied plasma PAI-1 levels and relationships with risk factors for metabolic syndrome, including fatty liver, in 170 patients. Liver ultrasound scan was performed on all patients, and a liver biopsy was performed on those patients with chronically elevated transaminase levels. Plasma PAI-1 levels correlated significantly (P < .05) with body mass index, degree of steatosis, insulin resistance, insulin level, waist circumference, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) -cholesterol. However, only body mass index (beta = .455) and HDL-cholesterol (beta = .293) remained predictors of PAI-1 levels. Liver biopsy revealed a significant correlation (P < .05) between insulin resistance (r = 0.381) or insulin level (r = 0.519) and liver fibrosis. In patients presenting features of metabolic syndrome, plasma PAI-1 levels were mainly conditioned by the whole-body fat content.

False positive reactions in confirmatory tests for syphilis in presence of antiphospholipid antibodies: misdiagnosis with prognostic and social consequences.

False-positive reactions in the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory test are well known, whereas a positive fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption assay is rarely thought to be a false positive. The non-recognition of serological false-positive tests for syphilis may have negative prognostic and social implications.